Pages Menu
TwitterFacebooklogin
Categories Menu

Posted by on Oct 9, 2025 in Blog | 0 comments

2025 NFL Analysis and Picks: Week 6

 

 

__________________________________
2025 NFL BETTING RECORD:
WINS — 40
LOSSES — 37
PUSH — 0
NET WIN/LOSS — – $275.
LAST WEEK’S RESULTS — 8-7-0 (+ $5)
STARTING BANKROLL: $10,000.
CURRENT BANKROLL: $9,725.
___________________________________

[ALL WAGERS ARE FOR $100 EACH AND ARE PRICED AT THE STANDARD 110/100 VIG, (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE]

 

LAST WEEK’S RESULTS:
[Click HERE to read the previous week’s report.]

Player Prop: SFO K Pineiro OVER 1.5 successful field goals (-115)…W
Minnesota / Cleveland OVER 36 points–full game…W
Philadelphia -3.5 (-115) vs. Denver….L
New Orleans -1.5 vs. NY Giants….W
Player Prop: NYG QB Dart UNDER 173.5 passing yards….L
Player Prop: NOR RB Kamara OVER 14.5 rushing attempts (-125)….L
Player Prop: NOR RB Kamara OVER 58.5 rushing yards….L
NY Jets +2.5 vs. Dallas….L
Player Prop: NYJ QB Fields OVER 188.5 passing yards….W
Houston -2 vs. Baltimore….W
Player Prop: LVR QB Smith to throw an interception–YES (-130)….W
Arizona -7.5 vs. Tennessee…L
Player Prop: ARZ QB Murray OVER 29.5 rushing yards (-115)…L
WAS / LAC — Both Kickers Successful 33+ yard FGs–YES (-130)…W
New England +8 vs. Buffalo (-105)…W

GENERAL THOUGHTS HEADING INTO WEEK 6:

Popular picks have been getting torched so far this season. According to the Action Network’s internal betting data, teams with 60 percent or higher measured by the number of tickets on those teams, are a dreadful 13-30 ATS through NFL Week 5. That’s the worst ATS mark for public bettors in the 23-year history of their tracking database.

In fact, 2025 continues a downward trend for the public teams and their results. Just in the last two seasons, teams with 60 percent of tickets and higher went 30-57-1 ATS (only 35 percent wins) in the first five weeks of the year.

Here’s more surprising information: Teams with 70 percent of tickets this season are a horrendous 3-13 ATS, including an abysmal 0-7 ATS when those teams are playing at home. The lesson here from the data seems obvious. Avoid popular public picks each week, or at least use the fade technique as a starting point in handicapping. I’ll certainly be leaning towards the unpopular teams in the coming weeks..

This powerful trend isn’t just applicable to sportsbook cash wagers. Contest players have also been getting burned. The consensus picks in the top two weekly NFL handicapping contests — Circa Millions and the Westgate SuperContest – are hitting just 42 percent after five weeks. So, fading these popular choices has been a winning strategy for those who have been the ultimate contrarians.

Now, let’s move on to NFL Week 6.

ANALYSIS AND PICKS FOR WEEK 6:

 

IMPORTANT NOTE:

Be sure and visit BETCOIN CLICK HERE for all of my game write-ups and picks for this week — up through Sat. night.

 

PHILADELPHIA -7.5 vs. NY GIANTS (O/U: 40.5] [Thursday Night]

Picking either side looks tough to predict. Laying the extra half point off of the touchdown on Philadelphia -7.5 is the kind of mistake that can burn bankrolls. I especially don’t like laying this kind of chalk in divisional games (recall last Thursday night’s SFO-LAR game as a prime example…laying the points seemed too easy). Add the short week, which could add to unpredictability, and I’m avoiding the pointspread.

The Eagles have looked underwhelming and inconsistent, even at 4-1 SU, but obviously they have a big edge in talent and experience over the Giants. It just depends on which Eagles team will show up. Instead, I’ll concentrate on a few prop wagers. This is because the Giants offensive game plan may be easier to figure out.

I considered several props. The best on the board appears to be related to NYG RB Skattebo. I like his props to go OVER — particularly on rushing attempts and yardage. The Giants WRs are in terrible shape. Star gamebreaker Nabers is now out for the year and the other WR Slayton is out for this game. This means the NYG offense has few skill position players to target. Accordingly, look for a steady diet of rushes and short high-percentage passes from QB Dart (who has a 65 pct. completion rate, but dreadfully low 5.2 YPC, one of the lowest marks in the NFL). He’s making just his third career start, though in both opening drives in his previous two games, the Giants scored a TD, showing solid preparation.

Rookie RB Skattebo should carry most of the workload on the ground in this game for the Giants. Combine this with the vulnerable Eagles’ defense, which has been below average in stopping the run this season. Skattebo is listed at 11.5 rushing attempts and 46.5 yards. He went 15 for 59 yards against the Saints last week. He also committed a critical fumble in the second half in the red zone that may have cost the Giants a go-ahead score. Afterwards, Skattebo apologized in the media and was given a huge vote of confidence by the Giants coaches and players. This shows the team knows he’ll play an increasingly bigger role in the offense and it’s important to keep up his spirits. I think that translates to a more determined effort this week and perhaps another steady number of opportunities. This is especially the case since the NYG don’t have much else on offense (which may allow the Eagles to stuff the run and force Dart into more throws–which admittedly is a concern).

Prior to that, Skattebo also had 25 carries in the upset win versus the Chargers, good for 79 yards. His other start shows 10 carries, good for 60 yards in a primetime loss to the Chiefs. His first game showed 11 carries for 45 yards. Still, that’s 63 carries for 240 yards in the four games he’s played….and those numbers should arc towards an upward tick. It’s important to note the other primary back in the NYG offense, Tyrone Tracy, has been injured the past few games. Reportedly as of Wed. afternoon, he’s likely to play Thursday night, but may not be at 100 percent. Even with him on the field and taking carries that could go to Skattebo, his projected yardage (O/U) at 22.5 shows betting markets expect he won’t go full-time. In fact, Tracy’s presence in the backfield could help Skattebo’s production since both will get carries.

The Eagles rank #22 in the NFL in rushing defense, allowing 136 YPG. Those are uncharacteristically poor numbers for a Vic Fangio-coached D. Surprisingly, the Giants rank #13 in rushing offense, which is better than one would expect from a 1-4 SU team that usually has to abandon the rushing attack late in games because they’re behind.

I think there’s another here to expect Skattebo to surpass 11.5 rushing touches and also go over 46.5 yards. Note that since Tracy was announced as playing, Skattebo’s numbers dropped slightly.

Obviously, we want a close game and long drives with lots of plays by the Giants. I think we could get it. The Eagles don’t look like a team right now that’s ready to blow out an opponent, which would hurt NYG rushing stats.

Wagers:
Player Prop – NYG RB Skattebo OVER 11.5 rushing attempts (-120)
Player Prop – NYG RB Skattebo OVER 46.5 rushing yards (-115)

 

NY JETS vs. DENVER (-7) (O/U: 43.5) [at London]

The 0-5 Jets have been a horrible team through the first 3 quarters, but have also been a “great” 4th-quarter team. Go figure. Here’s a shocking fact: They are tied with Detroit as the “best” 4Q team in the NFL at 12.2 PPG. That’s not a stat you’re likely to see on many capper pages or podcasts, but we should pay attention to this oddity for betting purposes.

What happens is — the Jets behind in games then pad the stats and play catch up, frequently versus defenses that are happy to allow time-consuming drives and easy yards when the game is out of reach. As evidence, look at the stat line of NYJ QB Fields who looks to be on fire! He’s thrown for 4 TDs and 0 interceptions while posting a career-high 100.1 passer rating (he’s played in only three full games). Readers should immediately recognize the pattern here. The Jets are a horrible team, but do make the final scores look more respectable late. They also pad the stats. Let’s look for wagers where we might take advantage of that this week, especially against a team (Denver) which is likely to be leading in the second half and might even be capable of blowout, shown by their shocking come-from-behind in at Philadelphia last Sunday.

Fields is listed at O/U 199.5 passing yards. I bet him OVER last week, and on cue, Fields delivered with 283 yards passing. Prior, he threw for 226 at Miami in another comeback that fell short. Fields opened the season with 218 vs. Pittsburgh. That’s three passing yardage numbers that sailed OVER the total. Let’s credit Denver’s top-10 defense, but they still allow 200 YPG passing to opponents, and that includes a couple of QB clunkers (the backup for Cincy and the rookie for Tenn). I expect Fields to toss for something in the 200s, no matter how this game plays out.

I’ll also bet the Jets in the 4th quarter in the pregame line, which is NYJ +1.5 points. I wrote above about NYJ’s strong numbers late in games. Defensively, the Jets’ 4Q numbers are also strong (but misleading), as they fare well against offenses that are just trying to run the ball, burn the clock, and go home with a win.

Wagers:
Player Prop — NYJ QB Fields OVER 199.5 passing yards
4th Quarter Only — NYJ +1.5 (-110)

 

DALLAS (-3) vs. CAROLINA (O/U: 49)

Carolina is tempting to bet on at home, getting points. The Panthers are 2-0 ATS and SU at home this season, and do seem to play much better in Charlotte than on the road. However, I’m wary about a terrible Carolina pass defense that surrenders massive yardage, despite playing against lackluster offenses, so far. Dallas could tag 40 on the Panthers they way they’ve been playing and I don’t know if the cats can keep up. I’m also concerned about a team that fell behind 0-17 last week against Miami. Credit the kitties for an impressive comeback and win, but that reveals the problems with Carolina on both sides of the ball that do remain problematic.

As is the case in the NYJ-DEN game, this could be an ideal spot to play the underdog home team – but only getting points in the 4th quarter. We presume Dallas could be leading, or if things really get out of hand (recall last week’s game DAL at NYJ), the trailing team scores a fair number of “trash” points. Not sure how this game breaks, but the Panthers getting .5 on the 4Q line looks attractive.

Note that Carolina ranks 4th in the NFL at 10.2 PPG in the 4Q. Carolina also ranks #6 defensively in the last frame, allowing just 4.0 PPG. Contrast this with the Cowboys defense, among the league’s worst — allowing 10.8 PPG which ranks 28th. While this admittedly is a small data set, there’s still some evidence the Panthers continue to fight in the 4Q, even when losing games. Facing Dallas is often an extra motivation, and it would please the home fans to run up some points where they can get them, so I can see the Panthers covering this number in multiple ways.

Wager:
4th Quarter Only — CAR +0.5 (-110)

< Analysis and picks is updated regularly between Wed. and Sat. >

FINAL PICKS FOR THE WEEK:
[For those who just want the picks.]

Player Prop – NYG RB Skattebo OVER 11.5 rushing attempts (-120)…W
Player Prop – NYG RB Skattebo OVER 46.5 rushing yards (-115)…W
Player Prop — NYJ QB Fields OVER 199.5 passing yards
4th Quarter Only — NYJ +1.5 vs. DEN (-110)
4th Quarter Only — CAR +0.5 vs. DAL (-110)
First Half: CLE +3.5 vs. PIT (-115)
First-Half — ARZ/IND OVER 23.5 points (-115)
Full-Game Team Total — INDY OVER 26.5 points (-140)
LA Rams -7 vs. Baltimore (full-game)
Full-Game Total — LAR-BAL OVER 44.5
Parlay Pays 2.6-1 — Rams -7 / Over 44.5 points
LAR RB Williams OVER 72.5 yards rushing (-115)
Seattle (pick) vs. Jacksonville (full-game)
Player Prop: SFO RB McCaffrey OVER 54.5 receiving yards (-115)
Player Prop: NOR WR Olave OVER 56.5 receiving yards (-115)
Player Prop: JAX QB Lawrence to throw an interception–YES (-145)
Green Bay -14 vs. Cincinnati (full-game)

 

IMPORTANT NOTE:

Be sure and visit BETCOIN CLICK HERE for all of my game write-ups and picks for this week — up through Sat. night.

 

Read More

Posted by on Oct 2, 2025 in Blog | 0 comments

2025 NFL Analysis and Picks: Week 5

 

 

*****************************************************************

2025 NFL BETTING RECORD:
WINS — 32
LOSSES — 30
PUSH — 0
NET WIN/LOSS — -$280
LAST WEEK’S RESULTS — 3-7-0 (-$495)
STARTING BANKROLL: $10,000
CURRENT BANKROLL: $9,720

*****************************************************************

ALL WAGERS ARE FOR $100 EACH AND ARE PRICED AT THE STANDARD 110/100 VIG, (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE)

 

LAST WEEK’S RESULTS:

[Click HERE to read the previous week’s report.]

Seattle -1 vs. Arizona (Full Game Line)…W

Seattle OVER 10 points Team Total in First Half (-120)…W

ARZ QB Murray OVER 212.5 passing yards (-115)…L

Carolina +5.5 vs. New England (Full-Game)…L

Carolina +3 vs. New England (First-Half)…L

Tennessee / Houston Largest Lead of game UNDER 14.5…L

Player Prop: NOR QB Rattler OVER 11.5 yards rushing (-120)…W

NY GIants Team Total UNDER 17.5 Points (-105)…L

Packers / Cowboys: Both Teams to Make 33+ Yard FG–YES (-135)…L

Moneyline Parlay: Denver / LA Chargers (Risking 100 to win 72)…L

 

GENERAL THOUGHTS HEADING INTO WEEK 5:

I’m always interested in learning about the methodology of successful sports bettors. If you ask a dozen for their opinion (assuming you can find a dozen), you’ll probably get more than a few dozen answers. There is no “one size fits all,” no “magic bullet,” and no “golden goose.” Different things work for different handicappers and different times. Given how things change across the league – be it teams or players or other factors – adjustments have to be made. Constantly.

However, one aspect of handicapping does remain consistent. As long as we put in the requisite time and stay up-to-date with breaking news (such as injuries and weather reports), at some point extra work becomes redundant. Spending 10 hours handicapping a single ball game rather than 5 hours doesn’t mean the analysis (or wager) is twice as reliable. It doesn’t even mean it’s better, as in some cases digesting too much information can lead to confusion. At some point, we “max out” on what’s available in terms of public information. Once the data is read, and studied, and digested it makes no sense to keep on regurgitating the same data. You can’t keep on rebuilding the same mousetrap.

Case in point — last week’s Bengals at Giants game. Cincy was favored by 6.5 points playing at the NY Giants. From the opening kickoff, the 0-3 Giants out-played and out-coached the 3-0 Chargers. They won in a huge upset 21-18. Survival pools blew up everywhere. Oh, and the Giants started a rookie QB who took his first NFL snap against the league’s #4-ranked defense. Go figure.

Prior to that game, if you saw anything in the preliminary data that suggested the Giants were the correct side to bet, I’d sure like to hear about it. If you read a stat or had secret information that the Giants’ cover would never be seriously in question during the entire game, then please share that with us. You could have spent 5 hours, or 10 hours, or 40 hours studying that matchup and I don’t think anyone would find supportive material justifying confidence in the Giants, let alone predict them winning the game. If I’m wrong, please contact me and educate me about it.

I use this example to illustrate how researching games, making predictions, and posting write-ups does have limitations. There’s only so much you can do pre-game and no amount of extra work or crystal ball gazing is going to be able to predict inevitable upsets, or blocked kicks on the final play of the game that results in a touchdown and cover (recall the Rams-Eagles game in Week #3). We do the best we can as handicappers, and we just have to accept that some things are simply beyond our control.

What’s important is to keep trying, and perhaps learn from the things we see, and correct the mistakes we make — if we can identify them.

After a decent start to the season, I’ve returned to roughly the break-even mark, and am down a few units in wagering. Let’s now move on to this week’s schedule.

 

ANALYSIS AND PICKS FOR WEEK 5:

<<< SAN FRANCISCO vs. LA RAMS (Thurs.) >>>

The betting trends in support of a wager on the Rams in this NFC West matchup are overwhelming:

— San Francisco is just 3-10 ATS in its last 13 games.
— They are 4-8 SU in the last 12 games.
— 49ers are 1-4 ATS in last 5 games vs. LA Rams.
— LA Rams are 6-1 ATS in last 7 games.
— They are 9-3 SU in its last 12 games.
— Rams are 5-1 ATS in previous six home games.

So, every trend points to LAR minus the points.

Both teams are 3-1, but that’s deceiving. One has looked like a Super Bowl contender (the Rams could be 4-0 right now, except for the last-play disaster in Phila.). The other has struggled most of the season, and been wildly inconsistent, in part due to crippling injuries. What the heck is happening in San Francisco where year-after-year this team can’t stay healthy and loses so many key players? I don’t get it. (and I have a huge wager on SFO to win the NFC this season, so these injuries are devastating to me personally).

The Rams are laying -8 as of right now and as much as I want to take the huge underdog, I can’t do it. The line move from -5.5 (early line) up over a touchdown suggests QB Purdy will not start (this is being written 36 hours in advance).

One player prop jumps out at me. Let’s go with SFO kicker Pineiro to exceed 1.5+ successful field goals. Pineiro has only played three games for the 49ers this season, after some good years in Carolina (88.7 percent successful on FGs over his career). In 2025, he is perfect 7-for-7 kicking FGs, including a long of 51 yards. With the 49ers likely to be struggling due to injuries and possibly starting a backup QB Jones, that could create a more conservative offensive game plan, and a willingness to take points when they can with a kick. SFO bypassed a few chances to go for it on 4th down last week, showing this team is a bit more timid than were used to seeing with Shanahan-coached teams. Both games between the teams last season were decided by six points or fewer. If we get a close game again this time, that likely helps the over on FG props.

Wager:
Player Prop: SFO K Pineiro OVER 1.5 successful field goals (-115)

 

Final Picks for Week 1

(For those who just want the picks….)

Player Prop: SFO K Pineiro OVER 1.5 successful field goals (-115)…W
Minnesota / Cleveland OVER 36 points–full game
Philadelphia -3.5 (-115) vs. Denver
New Orleans -1.5 vs. NY Giants
Player Prop: NYG QB Dart UNDER 173.5 passing yards
Player Prop: NOR RB Kamara OVER 14.5 rushing attempts (-125)
Player Prop: NOR RB Kamara OVER 58.5 rushing yards
NY Jets +2.5 vs. Dallas
Player Prop: NYJ QB Fields OVER 188.5 passing yards
Houston -2 vs. Baltimore
Player Prop: LVR QB Smith to throw an interception–YES (-130)
Arizona -7.5 vs. Tennessee
Player Prop: ARZ QB Murray OVER 29.5 rushing yards (-115)
WAS / LAC — Will Both Kickers Have Successful 33+ yard FGs–YES (-130)
New England +8 vs. Buffalo (-105)

IMPORTANT NOTE:

Be sure and visit BETCOIN CLICK HERE for all of my game write-ups and picks for this week — up through Sat. night.

Read More

Posted by on Oct 2, 2025 in Blog | 0 comments

These Disunited States: A Serious Question About Secession

 

 

THESE DISUNITED STATES:
A QUESTION ABOUT SECESSION

How many of you would vote for a national divorce? Another word for this is — a secession, which then becomes a partition. That would mean a state or group of states leaving the USA and forming a new sovereign nation. Of course, several states did try this once back during the 1860s and things didn’t turn out so well. But, let’s assume a modern hypothetical secession could be peaceful—-would you support it?

Answering this question requires creative imagination. Given the sprawling U.S. map and how states could presumably divide, many isthmuses would be necessary to connect states scattered everywhere. Moreover, big cities in some states would protest. And, rural people in other states would protest, too. No one wants to be a minority inside their own “country.” So, even if it could happen, there are problems with dividing along red-blue boundaries.

When you think more about it, secession sounds next to impossible in practical terms. But for the sake of discussion, let’s shelve those concerns for now and just talk hypothetically —

WOULD YOU AGREE TO A PEACEFUL SECESSION IF GIVEN A CHANCE TO VOTE ON IT?

 

Obviously, the boundaries of division are mostly along partisan political leanings. However, they are economic and social, too. Roughly half of politically-engaged people in this country think one way. And the other half believes the polar opposite. Unfortunately, this divide isn’t narrowing. It’s widening, a.k.a. worsening. Where this all ends or how we resolve this is a mystery. Yet all that aside, if we could live somehow as TWO SEPARATE NATIONS (peacefully), would you agree to such a proposal? [I know, this is the third time I’ve asked the same question]

I’ll ask a small favor here, before you post a reply. Think about your answer. It’s easy to make knee-jerk decisions and commit recklessly to something you may ultimately regret. So, think carefully and decide wisely.
BTW, both sides of the American red-blue divide have flirted with the secession question. Some states have also done so. Texas and Alaska have seen active secession movements in the last 20 years. California has also kicked the tires on the secession idea. I’m not sure there’s any monopoly on the idea of a secession since it’s come up in different political circles many times over the years, and is especially relevant today. I also wish to point out this isn’t a typical national divide. The partition of North vs. South Korea, North vs. South Vietnam, and East vs. West Germany weren’t voluntarily domestic agreements. Those divides were imposed by international powers, in connection to wars and post-war re-configurations.

I’m interested in reading responses, which should come from many perspectives. More important, I’m eager to ponder any reasons why you wish to share, as well as thoughts on who gets to keep what and what each nation is called after this divorce.

Note: This is an imperfect map. I’m just using here for illustration purposes.

Read More

Posted by on Sep 30, 2025 in Blog | 0 comments

What If the Band Refuses to Play?

 

 

Imagine taking the grand stage, expecting music, and then suddenly without any warning — the band refuses to play.

Stone cold silence.

According to early reports, that’s apparently what happened this morning at the Trump Wolf’s Lair, a gathering of 800 top military leaders summoned by the current crackpot regime which was held in Quantico. I wondered how these generals and assorted military brass who flew to the nation’s capital from all over the world would react to this unprecedented mandatory test-trial of a loyalty oath. I do feel great sympathy for these decorated military leaders, now forced into the excruciating decision over their careers and everything they’ve worked for (and rightly earned) *versus* becoming political mercenaries carrying out orders to go after their fellow Americans in a looming domestic conflict unseen since the Civil War. We’ve reached that point, right now.

The answer to this question may have revealed itself on this glorious Tuesday morning. Seventy years ago, it was the American military who stood up to the bullying of right-wing zealot Joseph McCarthy and effectively ended his witch hunts during the Army hearings. Fifty years ago, congressional Republicans may have saved America from the worst insecurities of Nixon. Today, it might be these generals doing much the same —– throwing up a gauntlet against Trump. Too early to tell–yes, of course. But this was encouraging, and a much-needed beacon of hope that perhaps we’ll make it through this idiocracy after all.

I was EXTREMELY PROUD to read this early report, of the military leaders choosing to remain loyal to the U.S. Constitution and refusing to go along with this MAGA madness. I didn’t write this (and I’d credit the author, if I knew the source *), but it’s an excellent summation of what happened today:
____________

“The Clapper-in-Chief and His Secretary of Sunday School

Donald Trump walked into Quantico Tuesday expecting a rally. He got a funeral.

The generals sat in perfect silence, faces locked in the kind of grim stillness that comes from years of watching idiots talk and choosing not to react. Trump, of course, couldn’t handle it. “I’ve never walked into a room so silent before,” he confessed, his voice trembling somewhere between wounded pride and panic. Then came the kicker: “If you want to applaud, you applaud.”

This wasn’t leadership. This was a washed-up Vegas act begging the crowd to clap. The Commander-in-Chief turned into the Clapper-in-Chief, reduced to prodding the nation’s top brass like a sad carnival barker who forgot his punchline.

A campaign rally in uniform.

Instead of strategy, Trump delivered his usual medley of grievances: Barack Obama ruined everything, Joe Biden ruined it twice as hard, and only Donald J. Trump, self-proclaimed “two-term, maybe three-term president” could save America. It was less a military briefing than an episode of The Apprentice: Pentagon Edition.

The generals, trained to withstand battlefield chaos, sat stone-faced through the barrage of nonsense. They have endured artillery fire with more enthusiasm.

Enter Pete Hegseth, America’s Pastor-in-Arms.

Then it was Pete Hegseth’s turn. Trump’s “Secretary of War” took the podium with the intensity of a man who thinks Tom Clancy novels are actual military doctrine. He promised “fire and brimstone,” called for purges of “fat generals,” and announced he wants the next war to look exactly like the Gulf War, because apparently it’s still 1991 and CNN is running that same grainy footage of tanks in the desert.

But Hegseth wasn’t done. He led them in prayer. Yes, prayer. The nation’s top generals, summoned by presidential ego, now folded into a forced altar call like extras at a megachurch revival. The separation of church and state? Obliterated. Constitution? Shredded. Jesus, apparently, is now Commander-in-Chief. Trump can play Vice.

Weakness on parade

Trump likes to brag about firing generals who “aren’t warriors.” But on Tuesday, the real firing squad was silence. Not one clap. Not one cheer. Just the steady hum of contempt vibrating off the brass like feedback from a dead microphone.

These men and women have seen actual combat. They’ve buried soldiers. They’ve lived with the weight of real command. And now they’re expected to cheer for a man who brags about moving “a submarine or two” like it’s a toy in a bathtub, or who lectures about “two N-words” as though nuclear strategy were a stand-up routine.
No wonder they didn’t clap.

The pin-drop presidency

What happened at Quantico wasn’t just awkward. It was diagnostic. Trump’s presidency is a hollow shell propped up by applause, and when the applause disappears, so does he.

And Hegseth? He’s the zealot-in-chief, delivering sermons about war and Christ in equal measure, a man confusing the Book of Revelation with the Pentagon’s operations manual. Together, they make quite the duo: one desperate for claps, the other desperate for amens.

The generals gave them neither.

Instead, they gave silence, the most cutting judgment of all.”

* Update: Credit Michael Jochum

Join and follow the discussion on Facebook — CLICK HERE:


 

Read More

Posted by on Sep 29, 2025 in Blog | 1 comment

USA! USA! USA! — Oh Please, Just Shut Up

 

 

“USA! USA! USA!” …. OH PLEASE, JUST STOP

Back in 1976, I was 14. My father took me to an international track and field competition. It was held inside the Fort Worth Convention Center. Team USA faced TEAM USSR in a 3-day mini-Olympics. Track and field, pole vaulting, gymnastics, and all the usual sports were displayed. Despite the USA and USSR being intensely at odds on the global political stage, in sporting competition the mood was very different. The crowd of several thousand, almost all Americans and overwhelmingly Texans, cheered when the athletes from the Soviet Union did something spectacular. Sure, we were all cheering for our fellow Americans. Yet, our *guests* merited respect. They also deserved praise when they won or accomplished something big.

Move ahead to 1980. Forty-five years ago, we who were of age and aware remember the glorious moment when the United States Olympic Hockey Team pulled off the upset of the decade at the 1980 Winter Games by winning the gold medal, defeating the evil Soviet Union. “Do you believe in miracles….yes!” …. roared announcer Al Michaels, and we all nodded and wept in joy. Truly, that special time and place can’t be overstated — if you were there and watched on TV, you remember. It was an astounding moment of jubilation that perfectly fit a new era coined by a new president to be, Ronald Reagan’s “It’s morning in America again.”

Since then, overt displays of intense patriotism have breached all sports. Sadly, each time we hear it, the chant and cheer seems just a little bit meaner and more concerning. In 1992, the Olympic “Dream Team” comprised of NBA superstars destroyed all the competition at the Summer Games. “USA! USA! USA!” became the familiar chant, once again. But this time, the joyous ring wasn’t quite the same as earlier. Watching the NBA’s greatest players manhandle hopelessly outclassed opponents and destroy Angola 116-48 in a basketball game didn’t seem something to enjoy, nor take pride it. It was like cheering for the sledgehammer at a slaughterhouse. That’s when I first started to get annoyed when I’d hear it. Go ahead. Call me a heretic.

In the years thereafter, American crowds and fans seemed to get a more obnoxious each occasion when jingoism arose. Sure, some banter in sports is natural, even fun on occasion. And, there are always more than a few drunken idiots at sporting events. Other countries and sports, namely soccer, have this problem, too.
Frankly, I don’t know if American crowds would accept an Olga Korbut or a Nadia Comanici again. I mean, it wouldn’t happen now like it did before. Recall that way back in the 1970s, those two gymnasts from rival nations became virtual teenage darlings in the United States. Their likenesses appeared on cereal boxes. Imagine, a Russian and Romanian were used to sell Wheaties. Their national flags didn’t matter. We fell in love with the *people*, and their greatness and grace. Seriously, can you imagine Americans embracing an athlete from a different country at an Olympic competition, today? I don’t think it would happen; certainly, not in this political climate.

Earlier this year, things turned ugly when Team USA faced Team Canada at the 2025 World Hockey Championships. Stoked then by Trump’s ridiculous anti-Canada rhetoric (he repeatedly threatened to “annex” Canada into the U.S.), the Canadians faced a barrage of chants and insults when they played games in the United States. It was all so purposeless and cruel. Shameful.

Jingoism plunged to even lower depths again this past weekend. I have absolutely zero interest in golf’s Ryder Cup and couldn’t care less about any of it. But we all saw and heard news reports about the widespread ugliness out on the golf course that was targeted entirely at European players. F-bomb chants. Insults hurled at top Euro golfers, even reaching an intensely personal level. Golf, once a genteel game of decorum and respect had turned into a UFC event. A few bad apples–maybe so. I’m willing to theorize these disruptive incidents wouldn’t happen without a fervent and widespread nationalistic movement that’s spilled over into sports and made competitiveness something way beyond spirited competition and fun. Many Americans admit they were ashamed (read many of the posts here on social media about the Ryder Cup incidents). Many even said they were rooting for the Europeans to win (and they did). I suppose we should be proud that many Americans exhibited class among the classless.

I still cheer for Americans on many occasions. I also cheer for athletes from other countries in these events when I learn about them and come to appreciate their stories. Flags aren’t so important anymore. I root for people, not nationalities. Correction — if the Jamaican Bobsled Team ever appears at the Winter Olympics again, I’m cheering for them. “Jamaica! Jamaica Jamaica!” Many of us love the underdog in a fight.

Given where we are in the world at this time, ugliness like what happened at the Ryder Cup will not be isolated incidents. I predict they will become increasingly common, and that’s very sad. I also have to assume this triggers more intense anti-American sentiment abroad (see how these ugly incidents are reported abroad–which get headlines and stokes anger and resentment). So, American athletes also suffer indirectly. That makes me sad, too.

No, I won’t be screaming “USA! USA! USA!” at the top of my lungs at any future sporting events. That doesn’t make me unpatriotic. There are plenty of Americans I will cheer for as people. I’m just not willing to reduce myself to irritating displays of blinding nationalism simply because of flags and the outdated rituals of antagonistic idiots.

Read More
css.php