“After consultation with my Generals and military experts , please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow … Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity  in the U.S. military. Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming … victory cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs  and disruption that transgender people in the military would entail . Thank you”
— President Donald Trump
Question: What’s braver than bigotry?
Answer: Any transgendered person who is willing to voluntarily enlist in the United States military, especially in face of so much ignorance and hatred.
Unlike the dirt-dumb, draft-dodging, tweeting-twat tainted with the stain of five cowardly draft deferments, many thousands of transgendered Americans have answered the call to duty and been brave enough to serve our nation. Listen up, Mr. President — you might learn something.
Instead of choosing to take their rich daddy’s dirty money and spend most of their lives dodging creditors, avoiding taxes, bankrupting bond holders and business associates, scamming poor college students, and preening for television cameras, many fine American citizens who also just so happen to be transgendered opted to join our armed forces. To me, this takes a special kind of person. So far, according to the U.S. Department of Defense’s own records, virtually all of these people on active duty and in reserve units have served honorably. Many transgenders even risked their in combat and were awarded the most prestigious honors we can bestow on the bravest.
Are you listening, you bumbling coward?
However, our bitter half-wit of President with absolutely zero previous military service — with no prior background in any form government — and who lacks any experience whatsoever in foreign affairs — shocked everyone yesterday when he tweet-farted an inexplicable official new military policy certain to disrupt and distract us all once again from things which are important.
The military ban against transgenders wasn’t just wrong in terms of its substance. The ban was yet another classless, poorly-thought through, politically-motivated smooch to the religious right wing hate machine, one of his few constituencies of continued support. It seemed to be made with all the contemplation of popping an Alka-Seltzer after a case of indigestion. The ban even blindsided the highest members of his own cabinet, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and all four branches of the U.S. military. They all woke up Wednesday morning to a new order from the President, with no sense of guidance nor any detail. Waking up in America now has been reduced to running to the crib each morning to see what the screaming baby has tweeted out to the world.
As is the case with all things Trumpian, the statement is pockmarked with blatant falsehoods and lies. See President Trump’s statement above. Accordingly, I have highlighted four particular segments in bold type:
 “my Generals and military experts” — Generals and military experts do not belong to you, Mr. President. Personnel in all branches of the military have served this proud nation long before you. They will serve once you are long gone — hopefully sooner rather than later. Moreover, the President clearly did NOT consult with anyone on his staff. President Trump lied. See: US JOINT CHIEFS BLINDSIDED BY US MILITARY BAN
 “in any capacity” — This was the line that took many by surprise. Clearly, there are many jobs in the military which transgendered people can do just as well as everyone else. The “fitness for combat” debate is perhaps worth having and we should let those who know combat have a strong voice in this. However, most jobs in the military are not combat-related at all. They are in support. Many are technical. Others are in repairs. These jobs should be open to everyone who’s willing to enlist, so long as that person passes the necessary training requirements. This includes transgendered people, too.
 “tremendous military costs” — Here the President is referring to a tiny fraction of enlistees who opt to have transgender surgery while on active duty. The Pentagon reports this medical cost amounts to about $8.5 million per year, which is about the cost of a couple of tires on a F-22 fighter. Just to prove the absurdity of this comment from the President, erectile dysfunction pills (such as Viagra) costs the U.S. taxpayer ten-times the amount as transgender surgeries — nearly $90 million annually. “Tremendous military costs,” my ass. President Trump is lying.
 “disruption that transgender people in the military would entail” — Wrong again, Mr. President. Not just wrong. But embarrassingly wrong. Don’t take my word for it. Listen to the RAND CORPORATION, the most revered, hawkish, pro-military think tank in the history of the United States. Rand released a comprehensive study on this subject last year. Their conclusion (in their words) was as follows: “Policy changes to open more roles to women and to allow gay and lesbian personnel to serve openly in the U.S. military have similarly had no significant effect on unit cohesion, operational effectiveness, or readiness.”
Here are a few additional *myths* I’ve come across on social media during the last day or so (with my responses):
MYTH: Transgenered people are bad for morale and combat-readiness:
Wrong. Rand Corporation’s study examined all nations where transgendered (as well as gay) people have served, including combat. “….little or no impact on unit cohesion, operational effectiveness, or readiness. Commanders noted that the policies had benefits for all service members by creating a more inclusive and diverse force.”
MYTH: Transgenered people don’t make as good a soldier as “straight” enlistees.
False. There is no evidence in support of this. Yes, there are some anecdotal experiences of bigots who may not have been entirely comfortable serving alongside people they think are different. Yet, nearly two years into the policy of inclusion and nearly two decades into a more open policy towards gays, military preparedness has not been impacted whatsoever by their inclusion. If anything, given some difficulty in recruiting talent and finding people willing to engage in combat, the volunteerism by transgenders (and gays) has been positive.
MYTH: The military is not a place for social experimentation and forced engineering of equality.
Bullshit. The same sadly pathetic outdated arguments were once used against Blacks serving when the armed forces were fully integrated in 1948. Later, Blacks ended up serving in disproportionally higher numbers in combat when Vietnam came around, thus negating the “social experimentation” claim. Later, the same prejudice was used against women enlisting in various jobs. Then, the same excuse was pulled from the mothballs again when we began allowing gays to serve. Now, here were are in 2017, and the old putrid stench of bigotry is back rearing its ugly head once again.
MYTH: The military isn’t like civilian life or other government jobs. Service men and women do not enjoy the same rights.
This is true, in part. However, we’ve seen over the generations that military service is often a critical gateway to accessing education and training. This has especially been the case for the poor and lower middle-class who have looked to the military as a springboard to a solid career, a good-paying job, and greater stability later in life. Those who are able to serve and gain skills are often preferable job candidates. They enjoy advantages over non-veterans, especially in many technical, medical, and security jobs (vets get preferential hiring treatment in most government positions). Denying any person access to the military DISCRIMINATES AGAINST THAT PERSON FOR THE REST OF THEIR LIFE.
MYTH: We should listen to the military people alone on this issue. They know more about this than we do.
Yes, we should listen to the military people. But we should also listen to others, too. In the past, a large contingent of the military opposed racial integration, saying it would destroy morale. They were wrong.
MYTH: The military isn’t the place to take risks, especially with lives on the line.
False. The military has always been the greatest risktaker in America. The military rolls experimental aircraft down runways, manned by brave pilots who don’t know if the plane will fly or crash. The military uses all kinds of experimental weapons, many of which explode accidentally. The military engages in risks in battle — almost daily. Risk is a fundamental part of life in the military, for everyone. Hence, allowing .02 percent of the armed forces to be made up of transgendered personnel seems like a relatively minor risk, especially given that it’s produced no discernible issues, so far.
MYTH: Transgenders are enlisting to get free surgery, at taxpayer expense.
Numbers vary, but out of 1.3 million service personnel currently in uniform, somewhere between 1,600 and 6,500 are believed to be transgendered. The actual number of trans-related surgeries performed each year is quite small. Moreover, the motivation for joining the military varies. Many enlist in order to get training and education. Some seek the benefits. Quite a few simply want to serve their country out of patriotism. The same motivations which apply to “straights” also apply to transgenders.
My position is simple: I will stand up and fight for equal opportunity for all, including transgender people. This is NON-NEGOTIATIABE. It is a basic human right.
In conclusion, I have but one final question for all the bigots and blindly-obedient Trump fluffers out there who think banning transgender people (or anyone else physically and mentally fit to serve) is a good policy:
Why are you so afraid of transgender people?
Here’s a thought: Perhaps you’re the one who needs mental counseling.