Pages Menu
Categories Menu

Posted by on Aug 10, 2014 in Blog, Essays, What's Left | 13 comments

President Obama’s Longest Vacation



At least LBJ tried


See, there’s a humongous difference between liberals and conservatives when it comes to views on how government should work, and what’s to be done by those we elect to be in charge.  We liberals believe in action and activism.  We want our leaders to lead, and to do so daringly.  Conservatives to the contrary, believe in doing nothing — unless it’s waging a war somewhere.  Conservatives are dismissive of Wall Street running wild and letting people, among them the most disadvantaged, to fend for themselves.  Accordingly, they chose to not govern at all.  They abdicate responsibility,  They’re on a perpetual holiday.  Question is — why does President Obama also seem to be on the same long vacation?


The image of agony shown above is one of the most revealing political photographs ever taken.

The iconic 1968 image shows a thoroughly exhausted and frustrated President Lyndon B. Johnson, one of the most gifted American political leaders in this nation’s history, at his physical and mental breaking point.  Here, we see him wiped out.  He’s finished.  Done.  A few weeks after this photo was taken, LBJ announced that he would not seek re-election.

Read More

Posted by on Jul 26, 2014 in Blog, Uncategorized, What's Left | 5 comments

An Open Letter to Almighty God




Dear Almighy God:

I don’t want to sound ungrateful or anything.  I really appreciate that you answered my prayer a few weeks ago, letting me win my $500 bet when that fighter Vasquez beat Cruz to bloody pulp.  That 8th round was beautiful.  I owe you one.  I’ll give $2 to a homeless guy and we’ll call it even, okay?

So, it really pains me to have to write to you this time, begging your heavenly holiness for another favor.

Read More

Posted by on May 19, 2014 in Blog, Essays, Featured, What's Left | 29 comments

The Difference Between Faith and Trust




Faith and trust are often used interchangeably, as though they’re one and the same.

They are not one and the same.  In fact, FAITH and TRUST are two entirely different things.  One may even argue convincingly, faith and trust are contradictory.

Faith has been called “the substance of hope.”  Faith requires no evidence for belief nor practice.  The very nature of faith surmises that tangible evidence doesn’t exist.  Otherwise, there is a manifestation.  On the other hand, trust is based largely on evidence that is real according to the senses and to human reason.  Trust is the core conviction of judgment based on knowledge, instinct, and experience.

To further extend this point and the distinction between faith and trust, consider a common everyday experience:

Imagine walking down a city street.  At one point, you step onto a well-marked crosswalk.  In doing so, you unwittingly place enormous trust in other people.  You trust the drivers of cars and trucks, presumably complete strangers to you to behave safely.  They are expected to obey the traffic laws.  You trust these drivers will be skilled and sober enough to observe you walking in the middle of the street and will come to a stop, thus allowing you to pass safely.

Based on volumes of evidence — including traffic fatalities which happen frequently in crosswalks, railroad crossings, and the like — placing this trust may be ill-advised.  After all, you know nothing about these drivers.  They could be drunk or distracted or sending texts and quite possibly not see you.  Should that misfortune happen, the end result could be a serious injury, or perhaps even death.  Nonetheless, we all step out into crosswalks anyway, usually without even thinking about the risk we are taking.  This is because trust is a fundamental provision of daily life and living.  We have no choice than to trust other people.

Now in another scenario, let’s suppose you were to step into that same unlit crosswalk — but this time during the night.  Let’s assume that most drivers wouldn’t be able to see you crossing until perhaps it was too late, and then you’d be run over.  Nevertheless, your decision was made to cross this street in the night based on some wayward faith.  Your faith tells you, you’re protected, perhaps even invincible.  One can readily see by this fantasmal make-believe scenario that faith is an utter act of stupidity, if not outright madness.  Faith has become dangerous.  Not only does faith have no actual basis in truth, it also lacks a common utility.

Society would be much better off with more trust, and less faith.  The late writer and polemic Christopher Hitchens shared the following perspective.  He had little regard for faith, writing much to the rancor of conventional thinkers:

Faith is the surrender of the mind, it’s the surrender of reason, it’s the surrender of the only thing that makes us different from other animals.  It’s our need to believe and to surrender our skepticism and our reason, our yearning to discard that and put all our trust or faith in someone or something, that is the sinister thing to me. … Out of all the virtues, all the supposed virtues, faith must be the most overrated.

Indeed, it’s peculiar that we regard faith as a virtue at all.

Faith is the abandonment of scientific principles.  Faith is the refutation of tangible evidence.  Faith, in all its many forms, is a wild jackal roaming the global Serengeti, steeped in the poverty of superfluous instinct, seemingly without cogitation or purpose.  In short, faith confuses things and makes the search for actual truth more ambiguous.  It clouds judgment.

Unfortunately, faith is too common.  The best example of faith in practice is religion and all its intended and unintended fall-out.  Billions of global citizens claim to be believers adhering to one faith versus another.  Certainly, we’re entitled to believe in spiritual Easter Bunnies and Magic Men and even Flying Spaghetti Monsters if we so choose to.  Everyone should have his or her right to believe in Tarot Cards or Santa Claus and have faith that flying reindeer will arrive once a year bearing a new plasma television.  But problems do occur when the faithful try to impose these illusory fantasies onto others, often by rule of law, or by force.  Even bigger problems occur when the faithful try to inhibit the actions of the faithless.  When this occurs, human advancement and scientific progress, so naturally intertwined, come to a screeching halt.

The hurdles of science are challenging enough without the added pitfalls of superstition.  Consider how faith has altered and often shaped human history, which continues to the present.  Consider the manner by which those claiming to be faithful incite biases against the discoveries of modern science.  Whether it’s believing in angels or denying evolution, faith is folly.  Faith is not only wrong — but also bad.  The very notion that we rest “in God’s hands,” enslaves greater human pursuits.  What’s the point of working tirelessly inside a laboratory trying to cure a disease if prayer actually works?  Why not toss all the test tubes away and just pray harder?  Why have trust (in science and mankind) when there’s faith (in the supernatural)?

Secular-humanism has been defined as “the application of reason and science to the understanding of the universe and the solving of human problems.”  To this end, we must trust in the insatiable desires of our most gifted and dedicated to continuing the ways of discovery which benefit us all, and those who follow.  Trust becomes a largely positive ideal not only giving life purpose but reaffirming human value.

This stark contrast between faith and trust illustrates the way religious believers and secular humanists look at the world and life differently.  While the faithful place their lives at the supposed goodwill of a theoretical supreme being, we secular-humanists are forced to rely on each other.  Accordingly, we are required to have trust in each other — which is actually the noblest of virtues.

Not faith, but trust.




Read More

Posted by on May 2, 2014 in Blog, Essays, What's Left | 1 comment

The Movie that Predicted Our Future




“I’m as mad as hell, and I’m not going to take it anymore!”

One of the most memorable quotes in movie history comes from Network, the visionary masterpiece directed by Sidney Lumet starring William Holden, Faye Dunaway, Peter Finch, Robert Duvall, and Ned Beatty.  But the film’s real acumen stems from a brilliant screenplay written by Paddy Chayefsky.

When released in 1976, the movie didn’t perform particularly well at the box office.  It came out at the same time as the first Rocky movie, which won Best Picture that year.  Nonetheless, Network became an instant classic, a creative muse, an enthralling satire, and even a cautionary tale — particularly within the cynical circles of social commentary.

Read More

Posted by on Mar 27, 2014 in Blog, Essays, What's Left | 0 comments

The Flight that Never Ends




What’s the longest flight you’ve ever taken?

Several hours?  Perhaps a day or so?

How did you feel at the end of that flight?  I mean, both physically and mentally.  Were you fresh?  Did you feel alive?

No.  Of course not.

You were totally exhausted.  Completely spent.  When the plane finally landed, all you could think about was getting off that airplane, going outside, moving around a little, and stretching your legs.  Getting home, where you could go on with living, probably became an obsession.

We tolerate being trapped inside what amounts to a small room for several hours at a time because we know the annoyances of modern air travel will eventually end.  We know the discomfort of not being able to move around is only a temporary condition.  We know the lousy food, cramped atmosphere, and unhealthy surroundings will last only a limited time before we’re able to run free and enjoy all that’s out there in the world, meant to be savored.

Read More