Pages Menu
TwitterFacebooklogin
Categories Menu

Posted by on Aug 14, 2013 in Blog, Book Reviews | 4 comments

50 Shades of Lunacy

 

50-shades-of-grey

 

So, I’m sitting in a strange airport reading the New York Post, a ludicrous enough notion without divulging the contents of an article which left me aghast.

According to the news story, at this very moment, the world’s best-selling author is someone named “E.L. James.”  For those of you still pretending not to know who this cretin is, she’s the reigning queen of smut, the author of a series of best-selling books which all began with something called “50 Shades of Grey.”  Think of a Harlequin romance novel, only sloppily written and with bondage.

Her trilogy of books are rip-your-hair-out dreadful, a twisted cauldron of old Penthouse letters and contrived sadomasochism illuminated by the narrative style one might expect from a Monday Night Football broadcast.  The basic storyline is some lonely woman falling for a rich guy (why is the prince of the story always rich — why not a truck driver?  Can’t truck drivers be sexy, too?).  Their sexual trysts gradually become more intense to the point where she’s pretty much reduced to wearing a collar, getting whipped by a riding crop, and barking like a dog.

Ruff stuff.

Spurred on by the unlikeliest of commercial successes, EL James has now surpassed the Stephen Kings, the Danielle Steeles, the Anne Rices, the Sydney Sheldons, the Tom Clancys, the Tom Wolfes, and essentially every other iconic writer in the world — at least when it comes to standing atop the profit pyramid.  Her (three) books reportedly earned $93 million just this past year.  Meanwhile, I know more than a handful of truly gifted writers who penned excellent narratives recently who can’t sell enough books to earn back their publishing advance.

Now, I’m all for this kind of thing, which is basically pornography for housewives and career women in the form of graphic sexual fantasy.  Bring it on.  If there’s truly a market for this kind of unfiltered expressionism — be it erotic fiction or the more visual stimuli usually preferred by men — then by all means do it and sell it aplenty.  Caveat Emptor.  But when the world’s most successful writer becomes E.L. James, who is famous for constructing narratives like what you’re about to read, then that becomes should be a collective jaw-dropping moment for all of us.  Consider:

“Before I know it, he’s got both of my hands in his viselike grip above my head, and he’s pinning me to the wall using his lips … His other hand grabs my hair and yanks down, bringing my face up, and his lips are on mine … My tongue tentatively strokes his and joins his in a slow, erotic dance … His erection is against my belly.”

“Suddenly, he sits up and tugs my panties off and throws them on the floor. Pulling off his boxer briefs, his erection springs free. Holy cow! … He kneels up and pulls a condom onto his considerable length. Oh no … Will it? How?”

 “Suddenly he grabs me, tipping me across his lap. With one smooth movement, he angles his body so my torso is resting on the bed beside him. He throws his right leg over both mine and plants his left forearm on the small of my back, holding me down so I cannot move … He places his hand on my naked behind, softly fondling me, stroking around and around with his flat palm. And then his hand is no longer there … and he hits me—hard.”

Sigh.

What worse is — there’s a movie coming.  I’m expecting “Twilight:  The Movie” meets “Mommy is a Gang Bang Slut.”  How they’re going to shoot this and make it “mainstream” is way beyond me.  Was I the filmmaker, I’d just drop the pretense and go ahead and make this an updated version of “Last Tango in Paris,” the 1973 shocker starring Marlo Brando coming off his Oscar-winning performance in a mesmerizing psycho-sexual slice of neo-realism.  Make the movie, accept the X-Rated classification, which would at least be true to the author’s creative vision of graphic sexual fantasy.

Of course, this won’t happen.  Hollywood won’t let it happen.  Instead, be prepared for “50 Shades of Light Grey:  The Movie.”

Now that I think about it, this movie might be so bad — it might be pretty good.  Sort of like reading the New York Post.

4 Comments

  1. She wrote, they bought and read. What’s the problem? You know the olde free market of ideas thing seems to be working just fine. Would I have preferred they were reading what I wrote – hell yes! But at least they’re not reading __________________________.

  2. her writing is sophomoric, but what else is new!

  3. i didn’t see this at facebook.

    my comments are limited solely to one thing:

    nolan? what was the reason why you paid good money to buy a copy of the new york post?

    although your column does not actually say that you bought the paper, you’ve never seemed to me to be the kind of guy who scarfs up abandoned newspapers in strange airports.

    for as long as i can remember, my father always brought home a copy of dorothy schiff’s new york post. it was very much on the left side, featuring columnists drew pearson, eleanor roosevelt, eric sevareid, and more. it had great sports and even had a weekly chess column!

    but rupert murdoch bought it in the mid-’70s. he was forced to sell it in 1988, but repurchased it a few years later.

    you know who rupert murdoch is, right? faux noise, and all that?

    so, what was the reason why you paid good money to buy a copy of the new york post?

  4. I’m confused a tad – WHAT exactly hit her hard?

    A sucker punch or his Johnson?

    And NO I’m not buying the books… or the Newspaper.

    Everything I read from this moment on is first screened by Mr. Dalla.

    My best friend was into these shades of grey stories as much as the ladies.

    I’ll ask him what hit her hard.. He’ll know.

    😉

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. 50 Shades of John C. Reilly | Nolan Dalla - […] READ:  50 Shades of Lunacy […]

Post a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

css.php