Pages Menu
TwitterRsslogin
Categories Menu

Posted by on Jun 19, 2013 in Blog, Politics | 4 comments

Time for the American Left to Throw in the Towel on the Obama Administration

 

121012_barack_obama_speaks_ap_328

 

Maybe the time has finally come to throw in the towel on the Obama Administration.

Our vision for change now has cataracts.  Neutered and scandal-ridden, President Obama seems about one more Charlie Sheen meltdown away from lame duckness.

In fact, President Obama isn’t a lame duck.  He’s a dead duck.  Politically speaking.

This isn’t entirely the President’s fault.  The obstructionist traitors known as Republicans haven’t governed or lead so much as they’ve blockaded just about every major piece of legislation that has anything to do with challenging American oligarchy.  Republicans would rather see America fail and the country suffer than to see President Obama succeed.  At anything.

Moreover, President Obama has received little significant support or guidance from his own party allies, now mostly an ineffectual milquetoast group of Democratic leaders governing as “Republican-Lite.”  If there ever was a groundswell movement to steer the country towards a more progressive agenda, it’s now vanished — at least until half the working class is stocking shelves for slave wages at Wal-Mart while paying a quarter of their income in health insurance costs, which is eventually going to happen the way things are going.  Then just maybe, we’ll quit buying the lies of unfettered free-market capitalism and nonsense about living in “freedom.”

Sorry, freedom isn’t having to work two shitty jobs to make ends meet or getting jacked around by institutions that should be promoting and protecting the interests of common people.  Freedom isn’t having to constantly worry about getting downsized by a giant corporation with a record-high stock price and then losing your health coverage, risking going bankrupt the next time you enter a hospital.  Freedom isn’t continuing to get raped by banks who used a taxpayer-funded bailout against the middle class.  Freedom isn’t continuing to wine and dine the bloated defense and intelligence establishment, an unprecedented waste of resources — not to mention a gross violation of rights and liberties foreshadowed by Orwell.

While the foundations of oligarchy aren’t necessarily the doings of the Oval Office, the continuance of the status quo is directly attributable to President Obama and an insular group of advisers who now look like they’re in hopelessly over the heads.  Consider the most dispiriting recent developments — IRS and NSA scandals that have rocked the Obama Administration to the core, which will now most certainly deviate much of Washington’s attention away from real problems in pursuit of a politically-driven witch hunt.

Then again, maybe the scandals don’t really matter.  After all, where’s the evidence that President Obama was ever committed to nationalized health care, reforming Wall Street, breaking up the banks, downsizing the fat cat “national security” establishment, or ending a pointless unwinnable war in Afghanistan?  Sure, he talked one hell of a good game — as a campaigner.  But it’s one thing to win an election.  It’s quite another to govern.  And now four-and-a-half-years into his presidency, we see nothing to indicate the Commander-in-Chief is going to turn into that horrible socialist monster everyone on the political right warned us about.  Indeed, he’s become a failure — not because he was one of us.  He’s a failure because he’s governed like one of them.

For those lost in translation:  Us, as in liberals.  Them, as in conservatives.

Just as the liberal candidate President Clinton ended up governing as a moderate to conservative for two full terms — particularly after his noble health care reform initiative failed early in his presidency — President Obama is well on his way to becoming the political love child of Clinton-Bush.  Despite all the chicken-little warnings about the so-called Marxist in the White House, the current administration really hasn’t governed too much differently than during the second term of either of his predecessors.  I challenge anyone to show me a major liberal economic or foreign policy agenda item that significantly breaks from what we might have seen either President Clinton or President Bush (II).

Let me put it another way.  When Richard Nixon is considered more of a liberal than President Obama, something’s very wrong.  When we see the Obama Administration make the same lock-step arguments defending “national security” that you’d expect to read in National Review, it’s pretty apparent they’ve crossed over to the dark side.

If there’s anything empowering from this utter sense of disappointment, it’s witnessing the left in what I think is our finest hour.  We’re not afraid to speak out.  We’re willing to criticize those who we once thought of as one of our own.  While conservatives made absurd excuses for President Bush and his disastrous policies for years, and still continue to do so, we liberals aren’t blinded by partisanship.  In fact, President Obama’s lackluster moderation seems even more treacherous to us now in light of the opportunity that’s been squandered.  The left has finally begun to see the bait and switch.  Lots of towels are now being thrown in.

In my writings, I’ve frequently drawn parallels between this President and Lyndon B. Johnson, two potentially revolutionary political figures who were strikingly similar the moment they first got elected.  Following his landslide election victory in 1964, LBJ browbeat Congress into action when he had the political power.  He became the greatest reformer and progressive since FDR.  The bold game plan for a new America — one that should have updated and then repeated by President Obama — was all there.  LBJ’s leftist agenda took place during one of the most turbulent eras in our nation’s history.  Yet while LBJ fought ferociously and largely succeeded in implementing his bold new vision of a “Great Society,” President Obama’s blueprints for change were abandoned way back on the campaign trail.  READ “PRESIDENT OBAMA’S SQUANDERED FIRST TERM” HERE.

“Change” was once a wonderful campaign slogan.

But now, it’s a foreign concept to a President who lost his way and now seems destined to aimlessly finish out three more do-nothing years.

For me, 2016 can’t get here fast enough.

Read More

Posted by on Jun 12, 2013 in Blog, Las Vegas, Politics | 6 comments

Is Harry Reid the Worst Senate Majority Leader in History?

 

senator--harry-reid

 

Over the past year, I’ve written many times that U.S. Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) might be the worst Majority Leader in recent memory.

I respectfully wish to amend my previous statement.

Sen. Harry Reid is the worst Senate Majority Leader in American history. 

Period.  Exclamation point.  End of discussion.

It’s not even close.

He’s the Secretariat of ineptitude.  A disgrace to the office.  And this opinion isn’t exactly coming from a Republican, if you know what I mean.

No one in history comes anywhere close to the monumental incompetence exemplified for so long by the senior senator from Nevada.  Put it this way:  When you get punked repeatedly by Mitch McConnell — Reid’s blundering counterpart from Kentucky, certainly no bastion of intellect — something’s wrong.  It might be time to depart the chamber.

Read More

Posted by on May 27, 2013 in Blog, Essays, Politics | 6 comments

Next Time You Hear a Veteran Talk About the War….

 

vietnam-war-medic-1966-granger (472x600)

 

Next Time You Hear a Veteran Talk About the War….

.

Listen.

That’s right.  Just listen.

Take a moment.  Pull up a seat.  And honor that man or woman with your attention.  It’s the least you can do.

They deserve it.

Next time that crazy uncle in your family brings up a conflict from many years ago that left scars, listen.  Next time your co-worker mentions that he served in Iraq or Afghanistan, listen.  Next time some guy at the bar talks about Vietnam or Desert Storm, listen.  And if you’re extraordinarily fortunate to meet one of the very few remaining World War II or Korean War veterans — keep completely silent.

Just listen.

You might not see the scars.  But as sure as you can hear their voices, trembling as they sometimes might to make it through the remembrance without breaking down, those scars are there.  Sometimes, they never heal.  The pain never goes away.

And for some reason, whatever reason, he thinks you are the one worthy of hearing his tale.

Consider yourself lucky.

Consider yourself blessed.

Just listen.

Read More

Posted by on Apr 30, 2013 in Blog, Politics | 5 comments

Counterpoint 1 — To Dr. Arthur Reber’s Comments on Religion (Evolution)

 

flat,550x550,075,f

 

Writer’s Note:  What follows is my response to Dr. Arthur Reber’s comments posted at his website on Monday, April 29th.  To read Dr. Reber’s commentary in full, please click here:  “We Can’t Forget Evolution”

 

Dr. Arthur Reber is correct.  We can’t forget evolution.  And we won’t.

Yet for all the wit and persuasiveness of Reber’s argument which he terms “a different framework for viewing religion,” he leaps to what I surmize are erroneous conclusions, many of which leave me both unsatisfied and unconvinced.

In his essay, Reber cites compelling (his supporters might insist – irrefutable) evidence from the field of cultural anthropology which suggests all societies — from ancient to contemporary and those in between — have embraced one form of religion or another.  He insists by the shear volume of these numbers and the “universality” of religious belief, we “have to acknowledge the powerful role is plays in people’s lives.”

Let’s begin by taking several quotes (hopefully none out of context) from Reber’s thoughtful essay, which I believe warrant additional comment and clarification from quite a different perspective:

1.  “….horrible acts can be carried out without a God.  Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot slaughtered millions under secular banners.”

First. let’s begin with the easiest distortion to refute.  Frankly, I’m surprised Reber would allude to gross historical oversimplifications to support his hypothesis on the sometimes vital role religion plays in totalitarianism.  Many of the 20th Century’s most evil regimes would never have come to power nor thrived were it not for religion — aided by cooperation with religious authorities as well as the nationalistic and ideological fervor of citizens of faith.  Whether it be Mussolini’s outright creation of The Vatican (state) via the Lateran Treaty of 1929 or Hitler signing his infamous Concordat with the Catholic Church in 1937, two of Europe’s most detestable societies weren’t simply enabled by church passivity.  In fact, they were bolstered by those who believed in fighting a “Christian cause,” particularly in the struggle against Bolshevism.

Read More

Posted by on Apr 26, 2013 in Blog, Politics, What's Left | 4 comments

It’s Time to Charge the Bush Administration with War Crimes

 

the-atlantic

War Criminals

 

I used to believe the campaign to prosecute top Bush Administration officials as “war criminals” was a farce.

Now, I’m convinced they have a point.

Consider the revelation earlier this week which reveals (former) President George W. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld each knew full well that many — in fact a majority — of the detainees at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp were (and are) completely innocent.

Not a few of the detainees.  A MAJORITY.

If Bush Administration officials were aware that even a single person was innocent of involvement in acts related to terrorism, but despite knowing so still demanded the individual be held for years without due process, that disclosure alone would be scandalous.  But the allegations these top officials knew that most detainees languishing behind bars inside a military prison, some being subjected to aggressive interrogation tactics, were in fact innocent isn’t just an appalling desecration of authority, but a miscarriage of justice which demands full prosecution.

A good starting point here is to expose the facts which are now known.  An article in this month’s The Atlantic magazine written by Conor Friedersdorf makes it abundantly clear that top Bush Administration officials knowingly violated the rights of hundreds of innocent people.  Accordingly to sworn testimony in federal court now coming to light, most of the more than 700 people imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay “had never seen a U.S. soldier in the process of their initial detention and their captivity had not been subjected to any meaningful review.”

Read More
Page 1 of 1012345...10...Last »